IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
.
ITA 741/2010
.
MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant
Through Mr. Ajay Vohra with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Somnath Shukla,
Advocates
versus
.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate
.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
.
O R D E R
07.07.2010
.
The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(for brevity ?Act?) is admitted on the following questions of law :-
i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the tribunal erred
in law in upholding the disallowance of the amount of Rs. 133,45,53,169/- which
represented Modvat credit of excise duty that remained unutilised by 31st March,
2001, i.e., the end of the relevant account year?
ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the
tribunal erred in law in upholding the disallowance of the amount of
ITA 741/2010
Page 1 of 2
Rs. 2,78,27,613/- under Section 43B of Act on account of credit available as on
31st March, 2001 in respect of sales tax paid on purchase of inputs?
iii) Whether the tribunal was legally correct in holding that the
provisions of Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 14A inserted by the Finance
Act, 2006, w.e.f. 1st April, 2007 would apply retrospectively to all pending
proceedings.
iv) Whether the tribunal erred in law in not directing the assessing
officer to limit the amount of disallowance under Section 14A of Act as computed
with reference to Rule 8D to the amount originally disallowed by the assessing
.
.
officer under Section 14A of Act in original assessment order dated 31st March,
2004 passed under Section 143(3) of Act?
Issue notice.
.
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal accepts notice on behalf of respondent.
.
List along with ITA No. 31/2005.
.
.
.
CHIEF JUSTICE
.
.
MANMOHAN, J
JULY 07, 2010
rn
.
ITA 741/2010
Page 2 of 2
#1