IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
.
.
.
ITA 32/2012
.
.
.
CIT ..... Appellant
.
Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. standing counsel (income tax)
.
versus
.
.
.
ANKIT GUPTA ..... Respondent
.
Through
.
.
.
.
.
ITA 35/2012
.
.
.
CIT ..... Appellant
.
Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. standing counsel (income tax)
.
.
.
versus
.
.
.
ANKIT GUPTA ..... Respondent
.
Through
.
.
.
ITA 37/2012
.
.
.
CIT ..... Appellant
.
.
.
Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. standing counsel (income tax)
.
.
.
versus
.
.
.
ANKIT GUPTA ..... Respondent
.
Through
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ITA 38/2012
.
.
.
CIT ..... Appellant
.
Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. standing counsel (income tax)
.
.
.
versus
.
.
.
ANKIT GUPTA ..... Respondent
.
Through
.
.
.
.
.
CORAM:
.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR
.
.
.
.
.
O R D E R
.
25.01.2012
.
.
.
Admit.
.
.
.
The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration:
.
?1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in annulling the
block assessment order ?
.
.
.
.
2. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has erred in law in presuming that the seized document did not belong to the respondent?
.
.
.
3. Whether the order of Income tax Appellate Tribunal is perverse in the
facts and circumstances of the case??
.
.
.
.
.
To be listed along with ITA No.499/2011, CIT Vs. Renu Constructions
Pvt. Ltd. and other connected matters.
.
Steps for service will be taken in seven days.
.
List for completion of service before the Joint Registrar on 28th
February, 2012.
.
Filing of paper book is dispensed with.
.
Parties are however given liberty to file documents/material which
were filed before the tribunal/authorities within a period of 12 weeks.
.
The period of 12 weeks in the case of the respondents will begin
from the date of service of notice.
.
Liberty is granted to the Revenue, to file an application for early
hearing and disposal of this appeal and other connected appeals.
.
.
.
.
.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
R.V.EASWAR, J
.
JANUARY 25, 2012
.
rs
.
.
.
.
.
$ 34
.