IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
.
ITA 1084/2006
.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL ..... Appellant
Through Ms. P.L. Bansal
versus
M/S DCM LTD. ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Santosh Agarwal
.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
.
O R D E R
22.08.2006
The Revenue is aggrieved by an order dated 16th December, 2005 passed by
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ?F? in ITA No.3610/Del/02
relevant for the assessment year 1994-95.
The Revenue has raised the following three questions of law for our
consideration:
a) Whether the ITAT was correct in law in remanding the issue back to the
Assessing Officer for deciding afresh the issue regarding addition of
Rs.1,11,61,491/- in valuation of closing stock of raw material in DCM Data
Products Unit?
.
b) Whether the ITAT was correct in law in deleting the addition of
Rs.1,90,01,701/- made by the Assessing Office by disallowing expenditure
incurred by the assessee in connection with issue of partly convertible
debentures?
.
c) Whether expenditure incurred by the assessee on issue of partly
convertible debenture is a capital expenditure or of revenue nature?
.
.
.
In so far as question (a) is concerned, we have already dealt with this
issue in ITA No.930/2005 and ITA No.1056/2006.
Under the circumstances, we are of the view that question (a) raised by
the Revenue is not a substantial question of law which would require our
consideration.
In respect of questions (b) and (c), we are of the view that a
substantial question does arise and therefore we admit this appeal in respect
thereof and reformulate the substantial questions for our consideration:
.
?Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in allowing the
entire expenditure of Rs. 1,90,01,701/- incurred by the Assessee in connection
with the issue of partly convertible debentures as a revenue expenditure??
.
Paper books be filed in accordance with the High Court Rules.
.
MADAN B. LOKUR, J
.
.
.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
AUGUST 22, 2006
Upreti
.
.
.
.
.
.