|
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 22526/2005 CAPT.SHAKTI LUMBA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rathore Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Shruti Mahendru, Adv. versus INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. and ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT O R D E R 19.12.2005 1. Issue notice. Mr. Bhasin waives notice; with consent of counsel for parties, the petition was taken up for disposal. 2. The Petitioner had approached this Court for quashing of order in respect of a charge sheet issued on 19.10.2005 and a consequential order dated 24.10.2005 by which his request for waiver of notice period for voluntary retirement made on 1.8.2005 was declined. 3. When the petition was listed for preliminary hearing on 25.11.2005 the parties were directed to explore the possibility of an amicable solution to the disputes. However, time was granted on 12.12.2005. 4. Mr. Lalit Bhasin, appearing for the Respondent Indian Airlines, states that the Petitioner's request for voluntary retirement can be construed as a request for resignation and that he has instructions to submit that the notice period for resignation, as per regulations applicable to the Indian Airlines and also as per the Contd..2.. : 2 : directives of the Director General Civil Aviation, can be suitably waived. It is, therefore, stated that the Petitioner's resignation would be immediately effective. 5. Mr. Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, who is present in Court, states that course of action indicated on behalf of the Indian Airlines is acceptable. Mr. Dwivedi however submits that the issuance of no objection certificate would still remain unresolved. He endeavoured to submit that by virtue of DGCA circular it is likely that the Petitioner would face some difficulty in the absence of no objection certificate. 6. I have seen Regulations 12-B and 13-B of the Indian Airlines Regulations and also letter of Indian Airlines dated 28.9.1995 construing the DGCA, circulars and the circular dated 27.10.2005 issued by the DGCA which is to the following effect : ?In this context, your attention is invited to Para 3.5 of the CAR on the subject Section 7, Series `X', Part II, wherein notice period of six months may be reduced if the Airlines employing them provides a No Objection Certificate and accepts their resignations earlier than six months. It is, therefore, considered that once the Airlines accepts the resignation earlier than six months, the Airlines do not require the services of such Pilots. In another typical case, an Indian Airlines Pilot, who had sought voluntary retirement under the appropriate clause of Indian Airlines Service Regulation, has referred to this Office that the aforesaid CAR for notice period has been applied in his case also. This office is of the view that resignation by an individual and retirement as per the Service Regulations in vogue of the employer, are totally different and that the subject CAR is not applicable in cases of retirement.? Contd...3... : 3 : 7. In view of the above, the Petitioner would not have to encounter any difficulty in the event he chooses to apply for alternative employment. However, if there is any impediment, he shall approach the Indian Airlines. Mr. Bhasin states that in such an event the requisite no objection certificate would be issued within one week from the receipt of request from the Petitioner. 8. The writ petition is accordingly disposed off in terms of the above submissions and directions. No costs. S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J DECEMBER 19, 2005 m 7
|
|